Archive for October, 2005

Football Picks, Vol IX

Thursday, October 27th, 2005

Can you believe this is already week nine of the college football season? I can’t!

Miami over North Carolina (W, Miami 34-16)
Ohio State over Minnesota (W, Ohio State 45-31)
Michigan State over Indiana (W, Michigan State 46-15)
Syracuse over Cincinnati (L, Cincinnati 22-16)
Wisconsin over Illinois (W, Wisconsin 41-24)
Wake Forest over Duke (W, Wake 44-6)
BYU over Air Force (W, BYU 62-41)
Oklahoma over Nebraska (W, Oklahoma 31-24)
Auburn over Mississippi (W, Auburn 27-3)
Missouri over Kansas (L, Kansas 13-3)
Georgia over Florida (L, Florida 14-10)
Florida State over Maryland (W, FSU 35-27)
Penn State over Purdue (W, Penn State 33-15)
Georgia Tech over Clemson (W, GA Tech 10-9)
Rutgers over Navy (W, Rutgers 31-21)
Oregon State over Arizona (L, Arizona 29-27)
Texas A&M over Iowa State (L, ISU 42-14)
UCLA over Stanford (W, UCLA 30-27)
Marshall over Tulane (W, Marshall 27-26)
Texas over Oklahoma State (W, Texas 47-28)
Northwestern over Michigan (L, Michigan 33-17)
Fresno State over Hawaii (W, Fresno 27-13)
Mississippi State over Kentucky (L, Kentucky 13-7)
Tennessee over South Carolina (L, SC 16-15)
TCU over San Diego State (W, TCU 23-20)

Record: Last week: 24-6 (.800), Season: 159-51 (.757)

Academic Update

Thursday, October 27th, 2005

From Pittsburgh:

A Duquesne University sophomore will risk being kicked out of school rather than write an essay as punishment for expressing his view that homosexuality is “subhuman.”

Ryan Miner, 19, of Hagerstown, Md., was sanctioned by Duquesne after posting his view in The Facebook, an online directory that is not related to the university.

Miner opposed an effort by other students to form a Gay-Straight Alliance group, an issue that is still being debated by the university.

Obviously, using the term “subhuman” is offense, and I strongly disagree with it. Still, it is his opinion, and I doubt that writing an essay is going to change it. As with the Jillian Bandes situation, we have a student being punished for expressing an opinion (on Facebook nonetheless).

I guess some speech is more free than others.

A Fall Leaf

Thursday, October 27th, 2005

It seems that fall has returned. Earlier in the week, we saw a sudden blast of winter that blew most of the leaves off the trees, but now the temperature has warmed a bit, finally giving us a feel of fall. We shall see how long this lasts.

Miers Withdraws

Thursday, October 27th, 2005

I think most of us saw this coming. It will be interesting to see who Bush nominates now.

Kerry Flip Flops Once More

Wednesday, October 26th, 2005

Defeated 2004 presidential candidate John Kerry has called for President Bush to bring home 20,000 U.S. troops in Iraq before Christmas:

“It will be hard for this administration, but it is essential to acknowledge that the insurgency will not be defeated unless our troop levels are drawn down … starting immediately after successful elections in December,” Kerry, D-Mass., said in a speech Wednesday at Georgetown University.

This represents a major position shift for Kerry, who advocated sending more troops while running for president, and as recently as June 30 said we didn’t have enough troops in Iraq.

The consensus on the Left has increasingly argued the U.S. should withdraw from Iraq. Think Kerry might be mulling another run in 2008?

Thoughts on the 2,000th Death

Wednesday, October 26th, 2005

A Soldier’s Perspective has some thoughts on the death of Staff Sgt. George T. Alexander Jr. (#2,000), and the media’s coverage.

Sharpton Speaks at UT

Tuesday, October 25th, 2005

The Rev. Al Sharpton spoke at the University of Tennessee last night. I wanted to go listen to him (not because I agree with anything he says, but because he is pretty entertaining), but alas, I had class. Stefanie Bowen was there.

Bush Defends Liberation of Iraq

Tuesday, October 25th, 2005

President Bush, in a speech to Joint Armed Forces Officers’ Wives’ group:

Some have argued that extremism has been strengthened by the actions of our coalition in Iraq, claiming that our presence in that country has somehow caused or triggered the rage of radicals. I would remind them that we were not in Iraq on September 11th, 2001, and al Qaeda attacked us anyway. The hatred of the radicals existed before Iraq was an issue, and it will exist after Iraq is no longer an excuse. (Applause.)

The government of Russia did not support Operation Iraqi Freedom, and yet the militants killed more than 150 Russian schoolchildren in Beslan. Over the years these extremists have used a litany of excuses for violence — the Israeli presence on the West Bank, or the U.S. military presence in Saudi Arabia, or the defeat of the Taliban, or the Crusades of a thousand years ago. In fact, we’re not facing a set of grievances that can be soothed and addressed. We’re facing a radical ideology with inalterable objectives: to enslave whole nations and intimidate the world.

No acts of ours involves the rage of killers. And no concessions, bribe, or act of appeasement would change or limit their plans of murder. On the contrary; they target nations whose behavior they believe they can change through violence. Against such an enemy, there is only one effective response: We will never back down, never give in, and never accept anything less than complete victory. (Applause.)

The murderous ideology of the Islamic radicals is the great challenge of our new century. Yet, in many ways, this fight resembles the struggle against communism in the last century. Like the ideology of communism, Islamic radicalism is elitist, led by a self-appointed vanguard that presumes to speak for the Muslim masses. Bin Laden says his own role is to tell Muslims — and I quote — “what is good for them and what is not.” And what this man who grew up in wealth and privilege considers good for poor Muslims is that they become killers and suicide bombers. He assures them that this is the road to paradise — though he never offers to go along for the ride. (Laughter.)

When 25 Iraqi children are killed in a bombing, or Iraqi teachers are executed at their school, or hospital workers are killed caring for the wounded, this is murder, pure and simple — the total rejection of justice and honor and morality and religion. These militants are not just enemies of America or enemies of Iraq, they are the enemies of Islam and enemies of humanity. (Applause.)

We have seen this kind of shameless cruelty before — in the heartless zealotry that led to the gulags, the Cultural Revolution, and the killing fields. Like the ideology of communism, our new enemy pursues totalitarian aims. Its leaders pretend to be an aggrieved party, representing the powerless against imperial enemies. In truth, they have endless ambitions of imperial domination; they wish to make everyone powerless, except themselves.***

Like the ideology of communism, our new enemy is dismissive of free peoples, claiming that men and women who live in liberty are weak and decadent. Zarqawi has said that Americans are, “the most cowardly of God’s creatures.” But let us be clear: It is cowardice that seeks to kill children and the elderly with car bombs. It’s cowardice that cuts the throat of a bound captive. It is cowardice that targets worshipers leaving a mosque. It is courage that liberated more than 50 million people; it is courage that keeps an untiring vigil against the enemies of a rising democracy. It is courage in the cause of freedom that will once again destroy the enemies of freedom. (Applause.)

Some observers look at the job ahead and adopt a self-defeating pessimism. It’s not justified. With every random bombing and every funeral of a child, it becomes more clear that the extremists are not patriots or resistance fighters — they are murderers at war with the Iraqi people, themselves. In contrast, the elected leaders of Iraq are proving to be strong and steadfast. By any standard or precedent of history, Iraq has made incredible political progress — from tyranny to liberation, to national elections, to the ratification of a constitution — in the space of two and a half years. (Applause.)

There’s always a temptation, in the middle of a long struggle, to seek the quiet life, to escape the duties and problems of the world, to hope the enemy grows weary of fanaticism and tired of murder. That would be a pleasant world — but it isn’t the world in which we live. The enemy is never tired, never sated, never content with yesterday’s brutality. This enemy considers every retreat of the civilized world as an invitation to greater violence. In Iraq, there is no peace without victory — and we will keep our nerve and we will win that victory. (Applause.)

Throughout history, tyrants and would-be tyrants have always claimed that murder is justified to serve their grand vision — and they end up alienating decent people across the globe. Tyrants and would-be tyrants have always claimed that regimented societies are strong and pure — until those societies collapse in corruption and decay. Tyrants and would-be tyrants have always claimed that free men and women are weak and decadent — until the day that free men and women defeat them.

Amen! (Via Power Line)

Christian – Muslim Relations Deteriorate in West Bank

Tuesday, October 25th, 2005

This is a new item I haven’t heard much about, possibly because so few of those affected are willing to talk publicly.

Galloway Lied… Is Anyone Shocked?

Tuesday, October 25th, 2005

It appears that British Labour MP George Galloway lied to the Senate during the Iraq/UN Oil-for-Food Investigations.

Christopher Hitchens:

For George Galloway, however, the war would seem to be over. The evidence presented suggests that he lied in court when he sued the Daily Telegraph in London over similar allegations (and collected money for that, too). It suggests that he lied to the Senate under oath. And it suggests that he made a deceptive statement in the register of interests held by members of the British House of Commons. All in all, a bad week for him, especially coming as it does on the heels of the U.N. report on the murder of Rafik Hariri, which appears to pin the convict’s badge on senior members of the Assad despotism in Damascus, Galloway’s default patron after he lost his main ally in Baghdad.

Yet this is the man who received wall-to-wall good press for insulting the Senate subcommittee in May, and who was later the subject of a fawning puff piece in the New York Times, and who was lionized by the anti-war movement when he came on a mendacious and demagogic tour of the country last month. I wonder if any of those who furnished him a platform will now have the grace to admit that they were hosting a man who is not just a pimp for fascism but one of its prostitutes as well.

Indeed. Read the whole thing.