Many Democrats, such as South Knox Bubba, are frustrated by Gov. Bredesen, whom they percieve as being too conservative, maybe even a sellout to his own Democratic party. On the other hand, many Republicans have supported Bredesen strongly (this may be partially due to the governor’s high poll numbers.
Thus Bredesen is conservative, right? Not so fast, as today’s News-Sentinel indicates:
Gov. Phil Bredesen said he is adamantly against putting a proposed “taxpayer bill of rights” into the state constitution, but he will not actively oppose an amendment to forbid gay marriage.
Questioned during an interview about proposed state constitutional amendments, the governor said he thinks popular election of the state comptroller, treasurer and secretary of state is a bad idea but is less strongly opposed to permanently banning a state income tax.
<...>
“I think the taxpayer bill of rights is a bad thing that goes to the heart of my ability to operate government day-to-day as opposed to some of the other things that are out there,” he said.
<...>
The governor said he believes the constitutional amendment unnecessary since state law already prohibits same-sex weddings, but “I won’t actively urge defeat” of the proposal.
He said gay marriage is “a vastly different issue from tolerance for gays.”
The jury is still out on Bredesen. I have given him praise in the past, and will continue to do so when he deserves it. I will say that I find myself mostly agreeing with the governor on gay marriage, so it isn’t a total loss. Many conservatives won’t be as understanding as myself, however.